In both cases, He "is an impersonal force; an indefinable, all-pervading deity. Hinduism recognizes hundreds, even thousands, of lesser gods." (Evangelical.us) the same is true in Buddhism, "God is an abstract. In essence, Buddhism is an atheistic philosophy." (Evangelical.us) in both Hinduism and Buddhism, there are stories of how the divine interacts with humans, but there is no historical proof. Only Christianity has historical proof. Since I am not Asian, I naturally want historical evidence, and I naturally want to follow a religion with a real God who cares about me as a person. Hinduists and Buddhists have no sense of self-worth in the scope of the universe. "Humans, as with all living things, are just manifestations of Brahman. We have no individual self, or self-worth. The world and everything on it are manifestations of Brahman. Sin is committed against oneself, not against God." (Contender Ministries) This idea is opposite to the truth, which is that we were all important to God; that the world is real; and that sin is real. I would only follow a religion where I was important...
No other religion has any kind of historical evidence and validity as Christianity does.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now